Should the master have thanked his benefactor? Take an extreme example of giving which lies at the opposite end of the spectrum : a bribe. Normally, the person who gives the bribe is thankful and, whether he says it or not in so many words, it’s taken for granted to be inherent in his attitude . The bribe taker, on the other hand, is usually never thankful for receiving it. At the most, if he’s feeling ashamed or bashful for accepting it he may mutter something like, “Oh where was the need for this,” or “You shouldn’t have.” There’s a reason for this; the person genuinely thinks he deserves the money for the services he’s offering in return. Illegal or immoral; it’s fair enough.
Or take a more acceptable and legal form of financial transaction like salaries which are generally given after the services have been rendered. Again, no employer ever thanks the employee for receiving payment at the end of the month. Because, again, he thinks he deserves it. If anything , the employee is thankful because by investing in that human resource , his business could proper with more profits coming in.
To assign the best motive to Umezu, we could say he parted with his gold because he probably believed in the spiritual service the school was doing for the community and wanted it to grow more commodious and expand . In which case he must have been already thankful for its existence. Of course he should not have asked the master to thank him but by the same logic given earlier, we would also have to assume that Seisetsu didn’t thank the merchant to begin with because he believed he deserved it for rendering those same services . How masterly is that?
MUKUL SHARMA
No comments:
Post a Comment